Finding the Feel-Good Zone: Psychological Responses to Exercise Intensity in Adults with Prediabetes

Authors

  • Inayat Shah Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Fazeelat Hajra Kareem Khyber Girls Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Saman Tauqir Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Keywords:

Prediabetes, Exercise Intensity, Psychological Response, Self-Efficacy, Affect, Motivation, Physical Activity Adherence

Abstract

Prediabetes affects a growing global population and significantly increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. While physical activity is a proven preventive strategy, adherence is often limited by psychological responses to exercise. This study aimed to examine how different exercise intensities influence psychological outcomes in adults with prediabetes. A randomized, within-subject crossover design was employed involving 25 adults with prediabetes (aged 25–55 years). Each participant completed four supervised treadmill sessions at 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% of their predicted maximum heart rate (PMHR), in randomized order. Each session consisted of a 5-minute warm-up, a 30-minute main exercise bout, and a 5-minute cool-down. Psychological outcomes assessed post-exercise included the Exercise Enjoyment Scale (EES), Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES), self-efficacy, rate of perceived exertion (RPE), Feeling Scale (FS), energy and fatigue, and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of intensity on enjoyment (EES), F (3,72) = 156.68, p < 0.001. Psychological responses—including enjoyment, self-efficacy, positive affect, and intrinsic motivation—increased progressively with exercise intensity, peaking at 70–80% PMHR. RPE also rose significantly, confirming the effectiveness of intensity manipulation. Moderate-to-high intensity sessions yielded the most favorable affective and motivational responses, while fatigue increased only modestly. Moderate-to-high intensity exercise (70–80% PMHR) elicits the most beneficial psychological responses in adults with prediabetes, including enhanced enjoyment, confidence, and intrinsic motivation. These findings support tailoring exercise prescriptions to include higher intensities, with appropriate supervision, to enhance both psychological and metabolic outcomes and promote long-term adherence.

Author Biographies

Inayat Shah, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Professor, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Fazeelat Hajra Kareem, Khyber Girls Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Physiology, Khyber Girls Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Saman Tauqir, Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

American Diabetes, A. (2023). 4. Comprehensive medical evaluation and assessment of comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care, 46, S49-S67.

Atlas, D. (2015). International diabetes federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 7th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 33(2).

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 11): Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.

Borg, G. (1998). Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales: Human kinetics.

Ekkekakis, P. (2009). Let them roam free? Physiological and psychological evidence for the potential of self-selected exercise intensity in public health. Sports Medicine, 39(10), 857-888.

Ekkekakis, P. (2017). People have feelings! Exercise psychology in paradigmatic transition. Current opinion in psychology, 16, 84-88.

Ekkekakis, P., Hall, E. E., & Petruzzello, S. J. (2008). The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified: to crack the 40-year-old nut, replace the 40-year-old nutcracker! Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 136-149.

Ekkekakis, P., & Lind, E. (2006). Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of self-selected and imposed intensity on affect and exertion. International Journal of Obesity, 30(4), 652-660.

Ekkekakis, P., Parfitt, G., & Petruzzello, S. J. (2011). The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Medicine, 41(8), 641-671.

Ghosh, V. (2024). ASSESSING ATHLETES NEEDS ANALYSIS, PAR-Q QUESTIONNAIRE, AND DETERMINING ENERGY NEEDS FOR PHYSICAL ACTIVITY.

Hagströmer, M., Oja, P., & Sjöström, M. (2006). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutrition, 9(6), 755-762.

Hardy, C. J., & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 11(3), 304-317.

Herman, W. H. (2023). Prediabetes diagnosis and management. JAMA, 329(14), 1157-1159.

Marcus, B. H., Selby, V. C., Niaura, R. S., & Rossi, J. S. (1992). Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(1), 60-66.

McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48-58.

Mullen, S. P., Olson, E. A., Phillips, S. M., Szabo, A. N., Wójcicki, T. R., Mailey, E. L., . . . McAuley, E. (2011). Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) across groups and time. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 8(1), 103.

Oliveira, B. R. R., Slama, F. A., Deslandes, A. C., Furtado, E. S., & Santos, T. M. (2013). Continuous and high-intensity interval training: which promotes higher pleasure? PloS One, 8(11), e79965.

Rhodes, R. E., & Kates, A. (2015). Can the affective response to exercise predict future motives and physical activity behavior? A systematic review of published evidence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(5), 715-731.

Smets, E. M. A., Garssen, B., Bonke, B. d., & De Haes, J. (1995). The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 39(3), 315-325.

Stanley, D. M., & Cumming, J. (2010). Are we having fun yet? Testing the effects of imagery use on the affective and enjoyment responses to acute moderate exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(6), 582-590.

Tanaka, H., Monahan, K. D., & Seals, D. R. (2001). Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 37(1), 153-156.

Williams, D. M., Dunsiger, S., Ciccolo, J. T., Lewis, B. A., Albrecht, A. E., & Marcus, B. H. (2008). Acute affective response to a moderate-intensity exercise stimulus predicts physical activity participation 6 and 12 months later. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(3), 231-245.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Shah, I., Kareem, F. H., & Tauqir, S. (2025). Finding the Feel-Good Zone: Psychological Responses to Exercise Intensity in Adults with Prediabetes. Sports Sciences and Physical Education Review, 4(1), LXIV - LXXVI. Retrieved from https://saturnpublications.com/index.php/ssper/article/view/57